Abdullah Sameer

أَلَا يَعْلَمُ مَنْ خَلَقَ وَهُوَ اللَّطِيفُ الْخَبِيرُ Does He who created not know, while He is the Subtle, the Acquainted? (67:14)

Humans are nowhere near as special as we like to think (BBC Earth)

So apparently humans are not as unique as we thought. More and more evidence points to the fact that we are not as unique as we thought. “…and that all the differences are differences of degree, not of kind.”
This is so profound!

Humans are nowhre near as special as we like to think (BBC Earth)

Some interesting quotes:

  • The long-held view that chimps are selfish and mean is no longer acceptable, says de Waal. “People say that morality comes from God, from religion,” he says, but we can clearly see the roots of morality in many other species.
  • We once viewed ourselves as the only creatures with emotions, morality, and culture. But the more we investigate the animal kingdom, the more we discover that is simply not true. Many scientists are now convinced that all these traits, once considered the hallmarks of humanity, are also found in animals.
  • From the beginning of her time in Africa, Jane Goodall saw strikingly human-like behaviours. In her early research she referred to the chimpanzees as “he” and “she” rather than “it”. She also gave them names, something previously unheard of in academia, and began to describe their unique personalities.
  • Tool-use had been considered a uniquely human ability
  • Jane also discovered they ate meat: they were not vegetarians as had been assumed. And to get it they were using tools. She saw chimpanzees fishing for termites with twigs.
  • We also know that they are extremely good at reading each other’s facial expressions. So are monkeys.
  • Chimps’ social skills are the basis for another behaviour once thought to be uniquely human: morality.
  • A 2013 study found that they also know the value of cooperation. They will share food even if there is nothing obviously in it for them. The study found that they will split a reward equally, just as humans do. In one task chimpanzees shared bananas in the same way that humans share money.
  • Chimps also have some understanding of human minds. They can tell the difference between a person who is unwilling to give them food and a person who is unable to so.
  • Chimpanzees even have culture. They aren’t composing symphonies but culture can be defined as passing on knowledge, habits and transmission from one generation to the next.

Read more at BBC Earth

Funny relevant video: Capuchin monkey fairness experiment

Jesus in Islam, The Copy-Pasted Prophet

Jesus is a character that is out of place in Islam.  When you look at Christianity, the attributes of Jesus make sense in relation to their theology about him.  Jesus being born as a virgin and having no father fits well in the claim of Jesus being the son of God.  The titles of Jesus don’t make sense in Islam. The stories about Jesus we find in the Quran we have found sources for in ancient Syriac documents.

(more…)

The Evolution of Jesus in the Bible (Video)

This is a very well presented video on how a historic person becomes a legendary person. Compares the story of Jesus to the story of Hercules and the common argument of Liar, Lunatic, or Lord

Also talks about the early Bible and how we can see the evolution of Jesus from a man into a son of God. This video is presented in an easy to watch and fun format. You won’t be bored at all. 11mins

Evolution of Jesus

The Evolution of Jesus in the Bible

Excellent video.

The Eloquence and Beauty of the Quran

This post is based on a video by an Arab ex-muslim.  Video at end.

 

There are two major points of view as to why the Quran is amazing.  The first is its eloquence and beauty. The second and more modern claim is the scientific claims approach.  A lot of emphasis is put on him being illiterate, as if this means he couldn’t compose the Quran.  Knowledge and skills were passed on orally.

One of the challenges is that the Quran asks for a book to be produced like it.  The problem with this claim is it can’t be judged objectively.  Many works surpass the Quran in Arabic and other languages, but of course Muslims have a different opinion.  If it means that someone has to bring something EXACTLY like the Quran then this is impossible because every book contains a fingerprint of its author.  But then again nobody can bring something exactly like Plato, AlJahiz, AlTawhidy, Dante, or Shakespare, and of course this doesn’t mean they are from God.  Finally, most people can’t speak Arabic so they can’t take up the challenge or even confirm that it is eloquent. They have to take someone’s word for it.

Some places are eloquent, and some places are badly written and akward.  16:06 for example is clumsy and poorly written:

Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief… except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith. But those who [willingly] open their breasts to disbelief, upon them is wrath from Allah , and for them is a great punishment;

Or this one which is incoherent and disjointed:

And [remember, O Muhammad], when We told you, “Indeed, your Lord has encompassed the people.” And We did not make the sight which We showed you except as a trial for the people, as was the accursed tree [mentioned] in the Qur’an. And We threaten them, but it increases them not except in great transgression. (17:60)

Or the bizarre jumping around of pronouns in Surah Yunus

It is He who enables you to travel on land and sea until, when you are in ships and they sail with them by a good wind and they rejoice therein, there comes a storm wind and the waves come upon them from everywhere and they assume that they are surrounded, supplicating Allah , sincere to Him in religion, “If You should save us from this, we will surely be among the thankful.” (10:22-23)

Or in Surah An’am

And it is He who sends down rain from the sky, and We produce thereby the growth of all things. We produce from it greenery from which We produce grains arranged in layers. And from the palm trees – of its emerging fruit are clusters hanging low. And [We produce] gardens of grapevines and olives and pomegranates, similar yet varied. Look at [each of] its fruit when it yields and [at] its ripening. Indeed in that are signs for a people who believe. (6:99)

If we wrote this, we would have been called ignorant.  But because its the Quran its hailed as glorious and the grammaticians created a special category called iltifat – sudden transition.

Next, look at this verse and tell me if you find it eloquent

And Mary the daughter of ‘Imran, who guarded her chastity; and We breathed into (her body) of Our spirit; and she testified to the truth of the words of her Lord and of His Revelations, and was one of the devout (servants). (66:12, Yusuf Ali translation)

That verse is described as Gabriel blowing into her private part through a hole in her garment.  Despite the Quran being hailed as a masterpiece of eloquence, the Arabs did not greet it as a masterpiece of eloquence. It took a long and violent struggle for them to win.  Khalid bin Walid and Amr bin Al Aas were from the last batch to convert only after they saw Islam was winning.  Not to mention Ikrimah and Abu Sufyan.  These guys did not believe Prophet Muhammad was truly a messenger of God but eventually they became Muslim after seeing the tide turn.

For example Ar-Razi, the brilliant mathematician and philosopher said:

You claim that the evidentiary miracle is present and available, namely, the Koran. You say: “Whoever denies it, let him produce a similar one.” Indeed, we shall produce a thousand similar, from the works of rhetoricians, eloquent speakers and valiant poets, which are more appropriately phrased and state the issues more succinctly. They convey the meaning better and their rhymed prose is in better meter. ,  By God what you say astonishes us! You are talking about a work which recounts ancient myths, and which at the same time is full of contradictions and does not contain any useful information or explanation. Then you say: “Produce something like it”?! (reference needed)

This post is based on the following video made by an ex-muslim:

Further reading:

The Quran And the Alexander Romance (Video)

This video goes into detail as to why Dhul Qarnayn described in the Quran is actually Alexander the Great.  It goes through multiple parallels of the two stories to demonstrate without a shadow of a doubt that the two people are one and the same.  Much has been written about this online already including how Alexander was given the name “The man with two horns”, but the actual details of the story are extremely closely related.

The Quran has many stories in it.  Infact one of the claims of its miraculous nature is that it contains many stories that Prophet Muhammad could not have known.  It is said that God himself told him these stories.

ذَٰلِكَ مِنْ أَنبَاءِ الْغَيْبِ نُوحِيهِ إِلَيْكَ ۚ وَمَا كُنتَ لَدَيْهِمْ إِذْ يُلْقُونَ أَقْلَامَهُمْ أَيُّهُمْ يَكْفُلُ مَرْيَمَ وَمَا كُنتَ لَدَيْهِمْ إِذْ يَخْتَصِمُونَ
That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. And you were not with them when they cast their pens as to which of them should be responsible for Mary. Nor were you with them when they disputed.  (Quran 3:44)
نَّحْنُ نَقُصُّ عَلَيْكَ نَبَأَهُم بِالْحَقِّ ۚ
It is We who relate to you, [O Muhammad], their story in truth…
وَكُلًّا نَّقُصُّ عَلَيْكَ مِنْ أَنبَاءِ الرُّسُلِ مَا نُثَبِّتُ بِهِ فُؤَادَكَ ۚ وَجَاءَكَ فِي هَٰذِهِ الْحَقُّ وَمَوْعِظَةٌ وَذِكْرَىٰ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ
And each [story] We relate to you from the news of the messengers is that by which We make firm your heart. And there has come to you, in this, the truth and an instruction and a reminder for the believers.

The first point is simply that the Quran mentions that they asked Prophet Muhammad about Dhul Qarnayn.  So we know this is an individual that was known to the questioners in Arabia.  This eliminates the possibility that Dhul Qarnayn is a completely foreign entity that nobody knows about.

Secondly, the two stories have very strong similarities including Alexander travelling to the east and west, seeing the rising of the sun from a people who had no cover from it, seeing the setting of the sun into a pool of water, etc.

Thirdly, why do Muslim scholars want to deny the similarity?  Because historical evidence has been found regarding Alexander the Great being a pagan idol worshipper, which means either the Quran is mistaken, or history is wrong, or the two people are not the same.  Since we have so much evidence that they are the same person, the only possibility is either history is completely wrong and fabricated (a conspiracy maybe?) or the Quran is actually the writing of Prophet Muhammad who included the popular fable of Alexander the Great in his “revelation”.